A legal operations manager sets up a Project for contract reviews. She writes a detailed description explaining that the team handles only UK contracts and that US precedents must never be cited, then adds the contract templates as knowledge.
What is the most important problem with this setup?
An HR team’s Project contains 60 documents, including the current handbook, the two previous versions, and several drafts. Answers about leave entitlements have started to contradict each other between chats.
A finance team’s Project has grown to several hundred pages of policy and procedure on a Team plan. Claude has started visibly searching the project knowledge before answering, which the team had not seen before.
A procurement analyst wants a Project to answer supplier questions from a 300-page supplier manual PDF whose key terms are in tables and charts, plus a spreadsheet of current rates that changes weekly.
A sales team keeps its price list in project knowledge, re-uploading it whenever someone remembers. A rep quotes a price that changed three weeks ago; the answer cited the uploaded file and sounded entirely confident.
An analyst adds a 350-page technical PDF to a Project. Much of the important information is in charts. Claude answers questions about the document fluently, but two figures it gives cannot be found anywhere in the text.
A team on an Enterprise plan wants to use the Google Drive connector to pull current policy documents into their Project. One member connects successfully; three others see no Drive option at all.
Which TWO explanations should be checked first? (Select 2.)
An Enterprise owner at a healthcare company wants one rule enforced everywhere: staff must never paste patient identifiers into Claude, and Claude should remind them if they appear to be doing so.
A marketing manager adds to her Instructions for Claude: “Be creative and engaging, and make our copy stand out.” Three weeks later her outputs are no different from before.
A Team plan owner has set organisation instructions requiring UK English and a formal register in client-facing writing. A consultant prefers concise American-style notes and sets that in his own Instructions for Claude.
An owner updates the organisation instructions to change how a product is named. A colleague tests it two minutes later in a new chat and sees the old naming, and reports the feature as broken.
A shared Project used by a sales team contains the current commission plan and the two previous years’ plans, kept “for reference”. Reps have started getting inconsistent answers about accelerators.
An operations lead updates the instructions in a Project that eleven colleagues use daily, tightening the required format for handover notes. She makes the change on a Friday afternoon.
An owner updates organisation instructions to reflect a new escalation rule and immediately posts in the company channel asking everyone to test it. Several people reply that nothing has changed.
What is the most likely explanation?
You can change answers until you check. Nothing is saved or sent anywhere.